Recent Buzz from the editor
15 of 10,077 results
Christian Brothers Investment Services: Impact & Justice Quarterly Review – Q1 2026
Christian Brothers Investment Services: Impact & Justice Quarterly Review – Q1 2026
(https://cbisonline.com/us/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/04/2026-Q1-IJ-Quarterly-Review.pdf)
Christian Brothers Investment Services (CBIS) has published its Impact & Justice Quarterly Review – Q1 2026, containing the details summarised below.
Key data
- Publication date: April 2026 (exact day not stated)
- Report type: Engagement
- Period covered: Q1 2026
- Frequency: Quarterly
- Scope: Whole-of-operations
- Fundamental focus: Engagement & stewardship
Contents and focal points
- An interview with Julie Tanner (Managing Director, Catholic Responsible Investments) and Raymond J. Burnell (Senior Director, Catholic Responsible Investments), tracing a decade-long CBIS shareholder engagement on child safety in technology
- The engagement is framed as originating from a papal challenge on investor accountability (Pope Francis referenced)
Specifics
- Sustainability themes: Child safety on digital platforms, ethical AI development and governance, corporate accountability in technology
- Sectors of focus: Technology, telecommunications
- Companies featured: Verizon, AT&T, Apple, Meta, Alphabet
Team update
Interview features Julie Tanner (Managing Director, Catholic Responsible Investments) and Raymond J. Burnell (Senior Director, Catholic Responsible Investments).
Differentiators
CBIS references the World Benchmarking Alliance's Collective Impact Coalition on Ethical AI as a collaborative investor initiative, and frames the decade-long engagement as directly inspired by a papal challenge on investor accountability — a distinctly faith-based stewardship narrative.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Sonnet 5 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Aberdeen Investments: Stewardship Report (Year Ended 31 December 2025)
Aberdeen Investments: Stewardship Report (Year Ended 31 December 2025)
(https://www.aberdeeninvestments.com/docs?editionId=50636955-103f-47cb-86e2-036aec4d30d4)
Aberdeen Investments has published its Stewardship Report for the year ended 31 December 2025, containing the details summarised below.
Key data
- Report type: Stewardship
- Period covered: Year ended 31 December 2025
- Frequency: Annual
- Scope: Whole-of-operations
- Fundamental focus: Engagement & stewardship
Contents and focal points
- Structured per the UK Stewardship Code's six principles: a Policy and Context Report followed by an Activities and Outcomes Report
- Active ownership activity spans public equities, fixed income/credit, direct and indirect real estate, economic and concession infrastructure, and private markets
Specifics
- Sustainability themes: Climate transition and scenario analysis, corporate governance improvement, sustainable investment governance, systemic risk management, transparency and reporting standards
- Sectors of focus: Financial services, community infrastructure, energy transition, sustainable transport
- Companies featured: JPMorgan Chase & Co. (audit committee governance), Water Gardens Harlow (community/social value), Auris Energia Oy (energy transition/biomethane), an EV Bus Platform (sustainable infrastructure)
Team update
Contributions credited to Peter Branner (Chief Investment Officer) and Dan Grandage (Chief Sustainable Investment Officer).
Differentiators
Published under the freshly-effective UK Stewardship Code 2026, the report reflects the group's rebrand from "abrdn" back to "Aberdeen Investments," completed across its site and legal entity names during the same period.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Sonnet 5 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
GMO: Stewardship and Sustainability Report 2026
GMO: Stewardship and Sustainability Report 2026
GMO has published its Stewardship and Sustainability Report 2026, containing the details summarised below.
Key data
- Publication date: April 2026
- Report type: Annual RI
- Period covered: 2025 activity year
- Frequency: Annual
- Scope: Whole-of-operations
Contents and focal points
- Organisation, investment beliefs and stewardship approach
- Integrating stewardship and investment, promoting well-functioning markets, and engagement
- Exercising rights and responsibilities, monitoring service providers, and a TCFD supplement
Specifics
- Sustainability themes: Climate transition risk and Scope 3 emissions via GMO's proprietary Indirect Emissions Model; corporate governance quality; an emerging focus on nature-related risks; UN Global Compact/OECD Guidelines compliance monitored via a "Heightened Review" escalation process
- Sectors of focus: Clean energy, batteries and storage, electric grids, energy efficiency, pollution control, agriculture, water treatment, recycling, defence contracting, commercial real estate, structured products, emerging-market sovereigns
Team update
Deborah Ng leads as Head of ESG and Sustainability and chairs the ESG Oversight Committee; other named contributors include Phil Zachos (General Counsel; Stewardship Subcommittee co-chair), Anna Chetoukhina (Head of Investment Risk), George Sakoulis (Head of Investment Teams) and Melissa Gallagher (engagement lead).
Differentiators
The report leans on GMO's proprietary ESG Score and Indirect Emissions Model rather than vendor ratings alone, and gives unusual detail on a centralised "Heightened Review" escalation process for UN Global Compact/OECD breaches; it also includes jurisdiction-specific sections (Japan and Singapore stewardship codes) and an appended TCFD supplement.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Sonnet 5 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
VBDO: How do we determine economic value(s)? [Whitepaper]
VBDO: How do we determine economic value(s)? [Whitepaper]
(https://vbdo.nl/en/2026/01/whitepaper-how-do-we-determine-economic-values/)
Whitepaper examines the economic framework that investors, companies and governments use to assign value and asks whether it adequately captures sustainability.
The paper argues that despite three decades of growing attention to sustainability and a proliferation of initiatives, genuine breakthroughs remain elusive because underlying economic assumptions still under-price sustainability.
It sets out the principles behind the current framework and asks how they relate to the future economy VBDO wants to see.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Sonnet 5 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Foresight Group: Dear Prime Minister: A Homegrown Solution to Britain's Housing Challenge
Foresight Group: Dear Prime Minister: A Homegrown Solution to Britain's Housing Challenge
Foresight has published an open letter from Richard Kelly, Managing Director and Co-lead of Foresight Natural Capital, arguing that Britain's planned council housebuilding programme should be built substantially from homegrown timber.
Kelly sets out five economic and environmental benefits:
- reduced reliance on imported timber,
- health gains from timber-rich buildings,
- faster construction,
- carbon storage in place of steel and concrete, and
- new UK forestry and manufacturing jobs
He points to France's public procurement of bio-based materials as a working precedent and argues that rising costs for carbon-intensive materials mean lower-carbon timber construction need not come at a premium, framing forestry and housing policy as mutually reinforcing rather than competing.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Sonnet 5 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Glass Lewis: Where Stewardship is Heading: Survey Findings on Outsourcing and Oversight
Glass Lewis: Where Stewardship is Heading: Survey Findings on Outsourcing and Oversight
Rickard Nilsson, Director of Stewardship (Europe) draws on Glass Lewis & Co's 2026 Investment Stewardship Survey to examine how investors resource and oversee stewardship.
It finds that three in four respondents do not use external engagement providers - though nearly half of asset owners do - with users treating them primarily as "capacity multipliers" for expertise and reach rather than wholesale outsourcing.
Asset owners increasingly want greater oversight of externally managed stewardship but face data-related obstacles in collecting and normalising activity information across managers, reflecting a market that still lacks standardisation.
On the ESG versus anti-ESG debate, respondents report only marginal influence on their priorities - some reduced US engagement and a tilt toward bilateral dialogue - but no wholesale reprioritisation.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.8 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Nuveen & EDF: Decoding data centers: Sustainability due diligence across the value chain
Nuveen & EDF: Decoding data centers: Sustainability due diligence across the value chain
Nuveen, in collaboration with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), has published "Decoding data centers", a guide to sustainability due diligence across the AI value chain authored by Sarah Wilson and Andre Shepley.
It positions AI as one of the era's most consequential investment themes with data centres as its physical backbone, while warning of a rapidly expanding environmental footprint of soaring energy demand, significant water consumption and real impacts on host communities.
The guide offers investors more than 75 engagement questions targeting technology companies, utilities and chip manufacturers, emerging approaches for managing data-centre energy, water and community impacts, an overview of existing metrics and disclosures, and asset-class-specific engagement considerations.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.8 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Profundo: Why inequality matters in Asia: finance, governance, risk and mitigation
Profundo: Why inequality matters in Asia: finance, governance, risk and mitigation
(https://profundo.nl/projects/why-inequality-matters-in-asia-finance-governance-risk-and-mitigation/)
Research examines how economic inequality in Asia intersects with the financial sector - as a source of systemic risk, a governance challenge, and an area where financial institutions can act.
The work frames inequality as material to investors and lenders rather than solely a social concern.
The report sets out how stronger governance, greater transparency and the integration of human-rights and ESG standards in financial actors' policies can help mitigate inequality-related risks across the region.
UKSIF: Flooding the Market: The Climate Mortgage Trap
UKSIF: Flooding the Market: The Climate Mortgage Trap
(https://uksif.org/flooding-the-market-the-climate-mortgage-trap/)
Warns that around 430,000 English homes could turn their owners into "climate mortgage prisoners" by 2050 as flood risk rises.
As insurers raise premiums or withdraw cover, affected households may be pushed onto costly standard variable rate mortgages and face repair bills of up to £45,000, leaving properties that are hard to mortgage, remortgage or sell.
The report argues that clusters of such homes could trigger localised credit crunches, collateral write-downs on lenders' balance sheets and, in a worst case, risks that cascade into wider financial stability. It recommends mandatory Flood Performance Certificates, confirmation of the FloodRe reinsurance scheme's future ahead of its 2039 closure, and stronger support for property-level flood resilience and green mortgages.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.8 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Bank of America Institute: Data center construction creates a resource shock
Bank of America Institute: Data center construction creates a resource shock
(https://institute.bankofamerica.com/sustainability/data-center-construction.html)
Bank of America Institute has published "Data center construction creates a resource shock", examining the hidden strain that AI-driven data centre growth places on water, power and materials.
It finds that up to 75% of a data centre's total water use occurs off-site — largely through electricity generation rather than on-campus cooling — while electricity demand from GPU-based servers is growing at roughly 30% a year, shifting the challenge from total energy supply to delivering firm, continuous power in the right location. Each incremental megawatt of data centre capacity embeds roughly 60–75 tons of metals, particularly copper, so as facilities scale they steadily draw on resources that local infrastructure was never designed to supply at this pace.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.8 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
S&P Global: Sustainability Insights: 1,000 SPOs, A Sustainable Finance Milestone
S&P Global: Sustainability Insights: 1,000 SPOs, A Sustainable Finance Milestone
Key takeaways
"Through the 1,000 SPOs we've published since 2008, we see financing frameworks becoming more transparent as scientific data and investor expectations evolve, with more quantitative eligibility thresholds, clearer exclusion criteria, stronger disclosures, and a gradual shift toward verifiable implementation.
We also see taxonomies and thematic sublabels shaping sustainable finance definitions, with taxonomies often used as benchmarks rather than solely an alignment tool and sublabels supporting targeted, outcome-oriented capital allocation.
Although post-issuance transparency is improving, with issuers increasingly aligning with common guidelines and disclosing clearer allocation data, impact metrics remain sensitive to the methodology and assumptions behind them."
Impact Cubed: SFDR 2.0: Disclosure or Labels Were Never the Point. Intent Finally Gets to What Is.
Impact Cubed: SFDR 2.0: Disclosure or Labels Were Never the Point. Intent Finally Gets to What Is.
2008. Lehman Brothers has collapsed. And I’m managing an environmental technology fund.
Fully invested, small-cap bias baked in by a strict 70% revenue requirement, the portfolio isn’t about to be spared. In the panic of a recently appointed portfolio manager, I unearth a water utility in the midst of a takeover. A (partial) safe haven, it is entirely aligned with what that fund is trying to do. In other words, the intent of that position is clear to me.
But I can’t buy it. The governance and construction framework behind the portfolio will not allow it.
The intent is clear; the evidencing architecture is not.
...
FTSE Russell (LSEG): Sustainable Investment Insights - July 2026
FTSE Russell (LSEG): Sustainable Investment Insights - July 2026
(https://www.lseg.com/en/ftse-russell/market-insights/sustainable-investment/july-2026)
The July 2026 edition of FTSE Russell's bi-annual Sustainable Investment Insights report reviews how its sustainable investment index strategies performed through the first half of 2026.
It finds that SI equity indices performed strongly over H1 despite the market volatility in March, and that green bonds both outperformed and saw growing issuance.
The report examines the energy shock caused by conflict in the Middle East - which raised short-term energy prices but may accelerate the energy transition over the medium to long term - alongside SI market fund flows and the rising physical risk associated with the newly begun El Niño.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.8 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Greenbank: Sustainability Update June 2026
Greenbank: Sustainability Update June 2026
(https://www.greenbankinvestments.com/knowledge-and-insight/sustainability-update-june-2026)
Greenbank's 'Sustainability Update June 2026' provides a round-up of recent developments in sustainable finance and their implications for investors.
It examines private-equity firm Permira's investment in environmental-disclosure platform CDP — a bellwether for the commercialisation of ESG data and ratings, where the top five providers now control almost 75% of the market - alongside the UK FCA's incoming oversight regime for ratings providers.
The update also covers the SBTi's stricter Version 2.0 Corporate Net Zero Standard and the new ISO 32212 transition-planning standard, the near-€400 million a year that AI and big-tech lobbyists spend influencing EU policy, and Brazil's Amazon deforestation falling to its lowest rate in six years.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.8 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Carmignac: Sustainable investment and corporate governance: a new driver of competitiveness? [Video]
Carmignac: Sustainable investment and corporate governance: a new driver of competitiveness? [Video]
A FundForum discussion with Lloyd McAllister, Head of Sustainable Investment, on how sustainable investing is adapting to shifting geopolitical, regulatory and economic priorities.
Lloyd argues the landscape has become more nuanced - spanning energy security, defence and Europe's competitiveness agenda - rather than representing a simple retreat from sustainability.
He highlights corporate governance reform in markets such as Japan and South Korea, where efforts to reduce valuation discounts and improve efficiency are drawing capital, positioning governance as a lever of international competitiveness as much as a sustainability issue.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.8 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
