Industry bodies
It often falls to industry bodies and trade associations to monitor the emergence of new social and environmental trends at the early stages of their development and to keep their members informed – before such trends become a central part of the competitive dynamic of the sector. In this respect, they share common interests with SRI investors who often monitor issues at the same stage of development with a view to identifying investable opportunities for SRI funds and keeping their mainstream colleagues informed of industry developments.
Responsible business groups
Sometimes, companies come together in coalitions as ‘Responsible Business Groups’ to explore and promote specific aspects of sustainable or responsible business practice.
There is a natural synergy of interest between these groups (which represent business at its most progressive and collaborative) and SRI (who are investors at their most progressive):
- SRI investors watch Responsible Business Groups with interest to learn from their research, to identify best practice and to preview emerging industry norms.
- Reciprocally, Responsible Business Groups often seek the support of SRI investors to promote the extension of their best practice initiatives and to encourage uptake by their peers.
The SRI industry is not one of the primary stakeholders or communications targets for industry bodies (as their attention is more normally directed towards the political, commercial or civil spheres). However, it can be incrementally useful to them to promote discussion of their ideas and objectives within the investment sphere and to receive reciprocal feedback on the interest of capital markets in their activity.
Industry bodies and SRI communication
The SRI industry is not one of the primary stakeholders or communications targets for industry bodies (as their attention is more normally directed towards the political, commercial or civil spheres). However, it can be incrementally useful to them to promote discussion of their ideas and objectives within the investment sphere and to receive reciprocal feedback on the interest of capital markets in their activity.
Industry bodies can rarely justify the cost of maintaining their own SRI communications programme and therefore need to ensure that the engagement that they do undertake is as efficient and targeted as possible.
Advice on this is contained within our SRI-Dynamics discussion paper:
- Engaging SRI: top tips - (coming soon) which outlines to industry outsiders how to shape and communicate social and environmental news and research in a way that maximises its value to the SRI industry
Industry bodies are likely to use the following services from SRI-CONNECT:
Market Buzz & Research
- Present their research to investors, members and potential members and, by communicating their perspective on emerging trends, to shape investor perceptions from an early stage
- Receive news, research and reports from companies, investors and others – also notifications of discussions, events and blogs – all filtered to their own specific interests
- Search the SRI-CONNECT database for research and reports
Directory, networks & discussion
- Find and filter profiles to identify relevant research providers, contacts at companies, analysts at research providers and experts at other organisations
- Present themselves and their investment-relevant activities clearly to the SRI marketplace
- Discuss issues of mutual interest with investors and analysts
- Organise briefing meetings for investors
- Gauge, via discussion groups, investor perspectives on their activities and research
- Build and manage their own SRI networks via the groups, events and messaging functions
SRI Dynamics discussion papers
- Integrated analysis: approaching a tipping point – which reviews how sustainability issues are being used to identify additional sources of investment risk and opportunity within SRI and ‘mainstream’ investment
- Take control of SRI communications – which guides companies on how to communicate effectively with SRI investors
- “Companies still don’t communicate” – the text of Mike Tyrrell’s contribution to the 2009 Corporate Register’s Awards Debate.
- Engaging SRI: top tips – (coming soon) which outlines to industry outsiders how to shape and communicate social and environmental news and research in a way that maximises its value to the SRI industry
Registration and membership
- These special considerations govern the access of NGOs to SRI-Connect
- XXXXX - MT to write sth about how NGOs can use the site to develop their profile and track progress
===
Build profile, distribute research, share ideas
Industry bodies can:
- Use Market Buzz to raise the profile of their research and share their opinions with investors and analysts (About Market Buzz | Post research & reports)
- Use the Directory to highlight their organisational and individual capabilities and interests (About Directory | Update your organisation's profile | Update your personal profile)
- Advertise events (About Events | All events)
- Monitor the developing profile of their firm and research with sustainable investment industry
- Response to requests for research made via the Research Marketplace
Learn & interact
Industry bodies can:
- Receive research that matches their areas of focus (About Market Buzz | View the latest buzz)
- Learn about the dynamics of the sustainable investment industry (SRI Primer | Ecology of SRI | Trends & opinion)
- Join discussions (All Discussion Groups)
- Make connections & send messages
Other
... and like all members of the network, they can:
- Careers, skills & jobs: Employ others and develop their own skills & careers
- People & networks: Network with, follow and engage with others
Note
These special conditions govern the access of NGOs to SRI-Connect
Individuals 50 of 5,633 results
Organisations 50 of 7,792 results
Buzzes 50 of 15,112 results
ESG on a Sunday: SpaceX-Zero
ESG on a Sunday: SpaceX-Zero
(https://esgonasunday.substack.com/p/spacex-zero)
The first comprehensive public ESG analysis of Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
We celebrate visionaries. We lionize disruptors. We invest billions in companies that promise to reshape our future. But what happens when extraordinary technical achievement exists alongside systematic failures in accountability, transparency, and governance?
SpaceX—valued at $750 billion, holding over $15 billion in government contracts, launching more rockets than any nation on Earth—operates in near-total ESG darkness. No sustainability report. No diversity data. No independent board. No financial disclosure. No climate strategy. No stakeholder engagement.
This is not an oversight. It is a choice.
After months of research drawing on regulatory filings, investigative journalism, legal proceedings, OSHA records, FAA violations, NLRB rulings, and employee testimony, I present the first comprehensive public ESG analysis of SpaceX.
The findings are dark.
Environmental Score: D Social Score: D- Governance Score: F Overall ESG Rating: F (0.6/5.0)
Zevin AM: Our Stance: Technology and Human Rights
Zevin AM: Our Stance: Technology and Human Rights
(https://www.zevin.com/news-views/our-stance-technology-and-human-rights)
Technology companies touch nearly every dimension of human life, and with that scale comes outsized potential for harm, and an equally outsized obligation to account for it. We believe the intersection of technology and human rights is one of the most consequential, and most underexamined risks in contemporary investing.
Our position
At Zevin Asset Management, human rights impacts in the technology sector are investment risks. Technology products deployed for surveillance, censorship, or military use without adequate governance oversight create measurable legal, reputational, and governance risks. These risks have real-world impacts and can erode the social, institutional, and market conditions on which long-term investment returns depend. We engage companies directly, file shareholder proposals, and coordinate with global investor coalitionsto press for effective due diligence processes that mitigate impacts on people, society and markets.
Why now
As artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and platform infrastructure proliferate globally, the potential for misuse by state and non-state actors has expanded dramatically. Technology built for legitimate purposes can be repurposed to stifle dissent, monitor minority communities, or enable violations of international humanitarian law. The stakes have never been higher.
Assessing the risks
1. Harms to people
Technology's most immediate risks are felt by us as individuals who bear the consequences of systems designed without their interests in mind.
-
Surveillance & censorship. Technologies deployed to monitor populations, suppress speech, or enable authoritarian control domestically and across borders — including commercial tools repurposed for immigration detention and border enforcement.
-
Data privacy & surveillance capitalism. The harvesting, monetization, and third-party sharing of personal data — including location, biometric, and behavioral data — in ways users cannot meaningfully consent to or opt out of.
-
Content moderation labor. Outsourced moderation workforces, often located in the Global South, exposed to graphic and violent content with inadequate mental health protections or labor rights.
-
Labor displacement & economic harm. AI-driven automation that eliminates jobs without adequate transition support.
-
Child safety & vulnerable populations. Algorithmic systems that expose minors to harmful content, enable predatory targeting, or fail to account for the particular vulnerability of children and youth.
2. Harms to systems
Beyond individual harm, AI reshapes the institutions, markets, and democratic structures that societies depend on.
-
Weapons & lethal autonomous systems. AI integration into weapons targeting, lethal autonomous weapons systems, and military decision-making, where algorithmic errors carry irreversible consequences and meaningful human control over the use of force is eroded.
-
Conflict-zone presence. Presence in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRA), including potential facilitation of international humanitarian law violations through the misuse of a company's products and services.
-
AI bias & misinformation. Generative AI systems that amplify discrimination, spread disinformation, or operate without adequate human or board-level oversight.
-
Environmental footprint. The energy and water demands of AI infrastructure—data centers, model training, and inference (broad use) at scale—and the communities, often low-income, that bear the local environmental burden.
-
Concentration of power. A small number of companies controlling foundational AI infrastructure creates systemic risk to markets, democracy, and the diversity of the information ecosystem.
3. Governance failures
Governance structures that insulate decision-makers from scrutiny and leave investors with limited tools to drive change.
-
Governance & disclosure gaps. Dual-class share structures and weak board oversight can concentrate decision-making power, insulate management from investor accountability, and obstruct meaningful evaluation of human rights policy.
-
Regulatory & legal exposure. Emerging and evolving mandatory due diligence frameworks, including the EU CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive) and CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) and reputational risks when companies fall short of their stated commitments.
How we advocate
-
We file shareholder proposals asking that companies report on how they determine whether their products are used for surveillance, censorship, or military purposes in conflict-affected regions.
-
We hold companies to their stated alignment with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). If companies claim alignment with international human rights standards, investors must be able to evaluate the effectiveness of those policies, not merely accept them at face value.
-
We engage Microsoft on the effectiveness of its human rights due diligence and Accenture on the conditions facing content moderation workers in the Global South who filter graphic and violent material before it reaches social media platforms. Our engagement with Alphabet addresses the misuse of technology infrastructure in high-risk contexts, while our engagement with Home Depot focuses on third-party data-sharing practices that may expose customers to downstream privacy violations, including access by federal agents for immigration enforcement.
-
We partner with coalitions, including the Investor Alliance for Human Rights (IAHR) and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR), Racial Justice Investing Coalition, and Center for Monitored and Ethical Investment to amplify investor pressure at scale across the technology sector.
Why we stay invested in hyperscalers
Technology is weaponized when commercial products and services built to connect, inform, or transact are turned into instruments of surveillance, enforcement, or censorship — a risk concentrated in hyperscalers, the companies whose massive cloud and digital infrastructure platforms make them the foundational layer of that transformation.
Clients reasonably ask: given what we know, why do we remain invested in companies like Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft rather than exit? Our answer rests on four considered judgments.
1. Dual-use, not inherently harmful
Unlike fossil fuel companies, whose core business is the source of harm, hyperscalers—companies that operate massive cloud and digital infrastructure platforms—produce general-purpose infrastructure. The same cloud platform that enables surveillance also powers healthcare AI, financial inclusion, and climate research. The harm lies in the misuse of technology and therefore theoretically can be changed.
2. Divestment forfeits our voice
Shareholder status is the legal basis for filing proposals, demanding board responses, and speaking at annual meetings. Divesting eliminates that access. For companies of this systemic importance, where governance failures carry global consequences, we believe the investor's seat at the table is worth more than the moral signal of exit.
3. Risk drives accountability
Staying invested does not mean accepting the status quo. We treat unmitigated human rights exposure as a financial risk that warrants escalating pressure: from private dialogue to public proposals to coalition action.
4. Scale of influence demands presence
Hyperscalers increasingly constitute foundational infrastructure for global commerce, communication, and governance. Ceding investor influence over these companies to shareholders less concerned with human rights does not reduce harm; it simply removes a committed voice. Collective engagement by responsible investors is among the few mechanisms capable of reaching inside these structures.
Our Commitment
Our framework distinguishes between companies actively suppressing accountability and those demonstrating credible, if imperfect, progress.
For hyperscalers that consistently obstruct meaningful human rights governance, divestment remains on the table as a last resort.
We are living through a period when the architecture of digital life is being constructed. The decisions made now about who controls it, who is protected by it, and who bears its costs will prove very difficult to reverse. Investment capital is not neutral in that process. It either reinforces the status quo or helps contest it. Continued investment is not unconditional.
The companies we hold are not simply firms with promising growth prospects; they are actors shaping the conditions under which billions of people work, communicate, organize, and seek redress. Our responsibility as shareholders is to make that power visible, to press for its accountable exercise, and to make clear that the right to profit from this infrastructure comes with an obligation to protect the people it reaches. That obligation is neither secondary to our investment mandate nor separable from it.
SSF: Swiss Sustainable Investment Market Study 2026
SSF: Swiss Sustainable Investment Market Study 2026
(https://www.sustainablefinance.ch/api/rm/4S566D3GA6955BM/ssf-2026-investment-market-study-final.pdf)
Key messages
- Switzerland stands out positively in terms of asset growth
- Financial industry remains committed in action more than in words
- Asset owners lead by commitment, especially on real estate
- Artificial intelligence is reshaping sustainable finance
- Nature-related investment opportunities are taking shape
- Extreme weather events are most material nature-related risk
Canbury: BP’s Green Board Disarray
Canbury: BP’s Green Board Disarray
(https://proxypro.substack.com/p/bps-green-board-disarray)
BP's directors are struggling to re-focus the company, likely left vulnerable by a UK governance code adverse to long (steadying) tenure - something Exxon's old guard did not suffer after Engine No. 1
Only one BP director was around before its 2020 low-carbon pivot, and that lack of institutional memory may be playing an important role in its recent leadership turmoil. Two weeks on since BP fired its chairman on May 26 after less than eight months in the job, and less than two months under new CEO Meg O’Neill, investors still seem unsure what happened. Albert Manifold arrived last September, taking the chair in October, with the blessing of activist Elliott Management that had called for the company to get back to petroleum. He was hired, and then fired, by a board with average tenure under four years.
One important reason for the shorter tenure is the U.K. Corporate Governance Code’s nine-year independence clock that encourages companies to shuffle off directors. In the U.S. there are no longevity-based independence rules and companies will routinely have some directors serving over 10 years (sometimes too many).
There are many, many reasons ExxonMobil and Chevron have stuck to oil and gas while the European oil majors pivoted away and now pivoting back, but steadier board leadership is potentially one of the factors. A noteworthy comparison is even when Exxon lost three board seats in 2021 to activist Engine No. 1, the new directors were absorbed and the company’s strategy stayed largely unchanged – benefiting its stock performance over the period.
TPI Centre: NEW Carbon Performance data on chemical producers
TPI Centre: NEW Carbon Performance data on chemical producers
(https://www.transitionpathwayinitiative.org/publications/171/show_news_article)
The chemicals sector is the largest industrial consumer of fossil fuels and one of the world’s largest manufacturing industries by market capitalisation.
This combination of broad economic influence and high emissions exposes the sector to transition risk and makes it a priority for credible decarbonisation pathways.
We are proud to launch our new Carbon Performance assessment for chemical producers, our 13th sectoral methodology, and one of the most complex we've tackled yet.
We've assessed 23 companies with a combined market cap of $1.02 trillion, comparing their historical and projected emissions against Paris Agreement-aligned benchmarks.
Given the sector's extraordinary heterogeneity, from petrochemicals to specialty materials, developing a credible, like-for-like framework was no small feat. Here's what we found, and how we got there.
Sustainable Fitch: ESG Regulations and Reporting Standards - June 2026 Highlights
Sustainable Fitch: ESG Regulations and Reporting Standards - June 2026 Highlights
Early 2026 Marks Another Step Towards an ISSB Baseline, with Uneven Implementation
- ESG regulation broadened in early 2026 beyond corporate disclosure into fund labelling and taxonomies.
- Sustainability reporting is increasingly coalescing around an ISSB baseline, though adoption timelines and requirements still differ materially by market.
- Climate disclosures are being implemented first, while Scope 3 treatment, assurance standards and ISSB-EU alignment continue to constrain cross-border comparability.
... includes ...
- Regulatory Focus Is Broadening Beyond Corporate Disclosure
- ISSB Convergence Is Advancing, but Comparability Remains Limited
- Notable ESG Regulatory Developments – 1 January to 15 May 2026
- Global ESG Reporting Converges Around ISSB, with Uneven Implementation Paths
- Europe Remains Shaped by the EU's Separate Reporting Framework
- Upcoming ESG Regulations to Monitor
FIR: VOICE Method: the first method for assessing the effectiveness and influence of engagement, developed by the FIR
FIR: VOICE Method: the first method for assessing the effectiveness and influence of engagement, developed by the FIR
(https://www.frenchsif.org/isr_esg/wp-content/uploads/FIR_Methode-Voice-GB_Interactif_08-06.pdf)
Following more than a year of intensive work, the FIR is publishing the first version of the VOICE method (Valuation of Influence in Corporate Engagement), a method for assessing the effectiveness and influence of shareholder and bondholder engagement.
This new VOICE method lays the solid foundations for a reference framework aimed at promoting a better understanding of engagement practices and to highlight high-quality engagements that have a real and lasting influence on companies.
The method is structured around four tools designed to:
- clarify the accounting of ESG engagements
- assess the likelihood of engagement’s influence according to a proposed five-level scale
- report on ESG engagement practices
- identify and mobilise the necessary resources
Pictet AM: Responsible Investment Report 2025 – Stewardship in Times of Change
Pictet AM: Responsible Investment Report 2025 – Stewardship in Times of Change
(https://am.pictet.com/uk/en/responsible-investment/responsible-investment-report)
Published: 2026
Summary: Covers engagement, voting, investment solutions and responsible investment implementation, with a particular focus on stewardship outcomes and long-term investor dialogue.
Companies featured as case studies
- American Water Works
- China Construction Bank
- Ecolab
- GFL Environmental, Inc.
- Haier Smart Home Co. Ltd
- Lindt & Sprungli
- Mankind Pharma Ltd
- Roche
- Toyota Motor Corp
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
DWS: Stewardship Report 2025
DWS: Stewardship Report 2025
(https://download.dws.com/download/asset/1dc13fd9-5f5f-445e-a8e0-3064712725d7)
Published: 2026 reporting cycle
Summary: Covers proxy voting, company engagement, climate stewardship, governance priorities and escalation activities. Includes detailed engagement statistics and case studies across global holdings.
... includes ...
During 2025, our engagement activities focused on three areas:
- Climate change and nature-related risks, including climate-related governance and disclosure, greenhouse gas reduction targets and transition planning, as well as biodiversity, deforestation, water management and resource use.
- Corporate governance, covering board composition and independence, succession planning, executive remuneration, audit quality and shareholder rights.
- Human rights and social matters, such as labour standards, health and safety, supply chain management, data protection, cyber security and ethical business practices.
Randstad: Annual Report 2025 (including Sustainability Statements)
Randstad: Annual Report 2025 (including Sustainability Statements)
Published: 11 February 2026
Summary: Includes dedicated sustainability statements covering talent development, fair labour markets, employee wellbeing, governance and environmental performance. Also complemented by Randstad's Local Sustainability Initiatives Report focused on workforce inclusion and the green transition.
Pearson: Annual Report 2025 & Sustainability Reporting Package
Pearson: Annual Report 2025 & Sustainability Reporting Package
(https://plc.pearson.com/en-GB/investors/2025-annual-report-accounts?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
Published: 12–13 March 2026
Summary: Integrated reporting from the global education and learning company. Sustainability disclosures are linked directly to workforce skills, lifelong learning, AI-enabled education, employee development and social impact. Pearson also publishes additional sustainability disclosures, climate reporting and assurance documentation alongside the annual report.
Adecco Group: 2025 Annual Report & Sustainability Reporting Suite
Adecco Group: 2025 Annual Report & Sustainability Reporting Suite
(https://www.adeccogroup.com/investors/annual-report?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
Published: 10 March 2026
Summary: Focus on employability, workforce skills, diversity, sustainable employability and social value creation, supported by dedicated non-financial reporting disclosures and sustainability methodologies.
WSP Global: 2025 Global Sustainability Report
WSP Global: 2025 Global Sustainability Report
Published: Spring 2026 reporting cycle
Summary: Focuses on climate advisory, environmental services, sustainable infrastructure and the firm's own operational footprint. Particularly useful given WSP's position as a major sustainability services provider.
Hays: Annual Report & Sustainability Report 2025
Hays: Annual Report & Sustainability Report 2025
(https://www.haysplc.com/~/media/Files/H/Hays/Sustainability/Sustainability%20Report%20FY25.pdf)
Published: April 2026
Summary: Covers workforce development, diversity, employee wellbeing, human capital outcomes and the firm's role in supporting green and sustainability-related employment markets. The report also discusses sustainability governance and operational emissions.
MSCI ESG: BP's AGM Was Contentious: This Proxy Season Could Be Too
MSCI ESG: BP's AGM Was Contentious: This Proxy Season Could Be Too
With the SEC no longer vetting shareholder proposals, companies have started self-certifying their own exclusions. As shareholders push back and turn to litigation, this proxy season may prove to be a defining one for shareholder rights.
MSCI ESG: USD 22 Billion Points to Future Carbon-Market Demand
MSCI ESG: USD 22 Billion Points to Future Carbon-Market Demand
Key findings
- Capital committed and deployed into the global carbon-credit market reached a record USD 22 billion in 2025, a 72% increase on 2024 and more than five times 2021 levels.
- Buyers contracting today are locking in future price and quality, while opportunities for investors, banks and project developers continue to expand.
- Waiting for spot demand to materialize risks leaving buyers with what remains, rather than what is highest quality. Financing structures to act earlier are becoming increasingly available.
... includes ...
- Capital committed to carbon-credit investment and offtake agreements
- From transactions to commitments
- Investment by deal sub-type
- Offtake by share of deal sub-type
- Confidence growing, even as participation narrows
- Future demand is building
- Positioning for future demand
MSCI ESG: Hormuz and the Fertilizer Fault Line (podcast)
MSCI ESG: Hormuz and the Fertilizer Fault Line (podcast)
(https://www.msci.com/research-and-insights/podcast/hormuz-and-the-fertilizer-fault-line)
When conflict disrupted gas exports through the Strait of Hormuz earlier this year, attention focused on gas prices and shipping lanes. But the shock travelled further — quietly rippling through fertilizer markets, where some producers were hit far harder than others, revealing how location-based risk can emerge deep within a supply chain.
Influence Map: The Battle Over Energy Security: Challenging the Fossil Fuel Playbook
Influence Map: The Battle Over Energy Security: Challenging the Fossil Fuel Playbook
In the wake of war in Ukraine and now in response to war in Iran, the fossil fuel industry has deployed a playbook of misleading narratives that push fossil fuels as the key to global energy security and affordability.
InfluenceMap’s research indicates that this strategy is more than just an opportunistic reaction to a global energy crisis.
In 2021, the fossil fuel industry predicted such a “black swan event upending the global political agenda” in the first half of the decade, and for years, it has acknowledged the likelihood and implications of the geopolitical and economic instability that might accompany a delayed global energy transition.
While the industry's strategy succeeded post-Ukraine, leading to new investments in fossil fuels, world leaders are beginning to recognize that fossil fuel reliance leaves countries vulnerable to future crises.
As geopolitical instability plunges the world into the second major energy crisis of the decade, the renewable energy and utility sectors are wresting back control of the energy security narrative, pushing back on decades of fossil fuel industry-driven misconceptions.
Influence Map: Vehicle Manufacturers' Contribution to US Regulatory Instability
Influence Map: Vehicle Manufacturers' Contribution to US Regulatory Instability
In response to the Trump administration’s repeal of major US environmental regulations and federal subsidies, automakers are reporting losses of tens of billions of dollars as they retreat from EV production. The industry’s lobbying against environmental regulations, however, may have contributed to the regulatory instability that it now faces.
US automakers have often emphasized the need for stable environmental regulations, citing the substantial time required to develop and manufacture new vehicles. Despite this, many of these automakers have lobbied for years to roll back US emissions regulations, either directly or through their industry associations, counter to a strong global trend towards the electrification of road transport, further accelerated by high oil prices resulting from the conflict in Iran, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s warnings that ambitious government regulations are needed to decarbonize the industry.
At the same time, they have inadequately disclosed these lobbying activities, keeping their own investors in the dark about their lobbying for the rollbacks that are causing regulatory chaos for the industry.
Influence Map: What BP and Shell’s Advocacy Says About Their Climate Strategy
Influence Map: What BP and Shell’s Advocacy Says About Their Climate Strategy
An Investor Note
This insight draws on InfluenceMap's assessment of BP and Shell's climate policy engagement from 2021–2025, using publicly available data and company disclosures up to the end of 2025.
With investor scrutiny intensifying ahead of both companies' 2026 AGMs, it considers what that record reveals about their positioning on the energy transition.
... includes ...
- Shareholder Scrutiny
- BP & Shell Regressing on Climate Policy Engagement
- Climate Policy Engagement Disclosures
- Advocacy as an Indicator of Strategy
Sustainalytics: Asset Owner Perspectives Survey 2026 Qualitative Insights
Sustainalytics: Asset Owner Perspectives Survey 2026 Qualitative Insights
The Takeaway
- Now entering our fifth year for this survey, this year’s qualitative phase gathered perspectives and insights from a series of live, in-depth interviews with 25 asset owners from around the world.
- This year, we recorded plenty of shifts in the market environment, global investment standards, regulatory standards, and policy in our conversation with global stewards of capital.
- Notable observations were a concerning yet necessary concentration in US market, increasing diversification to build resilience across global portfolios, a healthy caution around AI and growing interest in private markets.
Sustainalytics: Testing Markets and Building ESG Resilience (podcast)
Sustainalytics: Testing Markets and Building ESG Resilience (podcast)
Host:
Catalina Secreteanu, Managing Director, ESG Solutions, Europe, Morningstar Sustainalytics
Melissa Chase, Senior Content Marketing Manager, Morningstar Sustainalytics
Guest:
Bin Dong, Lead Analyst, ESG Methodology, Morningstar Sustainalytics
On the Evolution of Sustainable Investing and Constructing More Resilient Portfolios
In this episode of Sustainability in Conversation, we welcome our new co-host, Catalina Secreteanu. Catalina has worked in the sustainable investment space for the past 17 years, holding roles at UKSIF and Sustainalytics in the UK and Australia. During that time, she’s had a front row seat to how the industry has evolved. She shares her thoughts on where the market has been and where it’s going, as well as the challenges and opportunities along the ways.
Sustainalytics: ESG Resilience in Focus - What the US-EU Divergence Means for Portfolio Performance
Sustainalytics: ESG Resilience in Focus - What the US-EU Divergence Means for Portfolio Performance
Markets respond differently to risk. So does portfolio performance.
Portfolio resilience, return potential, and purpose‑aligned priorities are not mutually exclusive.
Our latest research examines how different regions price risk, how investors can evaluate trade‑offs between resilience, returns, and sustainability, and how these dynamics shape portfolio construction with lasting performance implications.
Building on our 2025 analysis, we study stress‑tested US and EU equity market data across multiple major market shocks to demonstrate how portfolios perform under pressure—and why outcomes differ by market structure and regulatory environment.
Download the report to see how these risk signals can be applied across regions to strengthen portfolio resilience in any market.
Video here
WRI: Where Do Emissions Come From? These Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector
WRI: Where Do Emissions Come From? These Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector
(https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors)
Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are rapidly warming the planet. But where do they come from? WRI experts explain which sectors emit the most GHGs.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Come from 5 Sectors
To understand where emissions come from, it's helpful to break them down by both sectors (such as energy or agriculture) and "end uses," or the specific activities that emit greenhouse gases.
... also ...
- Industry Is the Fastest Growing Source of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Carbon Dioxide Makes Up Most, but Not All, Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Understanding Emissions Flows Is Essential to Developing Climate Solutions
- Higher Ambition Starts with Clear Information
- Explore Emissions Data by Sector and Gas
WRI: How Might a ‘Super El Niño’ Affect Food, Forests and Water?
WRI: How Might a ‘Super El Niño’ Affect Food, Forests and Water?
(https://www.wri.org/insights/super-el-nino-impacts-explained)
"We asked four experts how this year’s El Niño may differ from past events."
The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), or El Niño, weather pattern occurs naturally every two to seven years, making some parts of the world drier and others wetter. But this year’s El Niño is shaping up to be a different beast.
Scientists predict an increasingly likely “Super El Niño,” where ocean temperatures in the Pacific rise higher than 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F) above average and alter atmospheric conditions more than usual. The result could be stronger, more persistent impacts around the world in the form of droughts, floods, cyclones, extreme heat and more.
WRI: New Data Shows What’s Driving Forest Loss Around the World
WRI: New Data Shows What’s Driving Forest Loss Around the World
(https://www.wri.org/insights/forest-loss-drivers-data-trends)
Data on Global Forest Watch reveals that 34% of tree cover losses worldwide from 2001-2025 were likely the result of permanent land use change, meaning trees won’t grow back naturally.
This percentage nearly doubles in tropical primary rainforests, to 60%.
... includes ...
- Different Drivers of Tree Cover Loss Have Different Impacts
- Some Drivers Have Outsized Impacts in Specific Locations
- Different Drivers of Forest Loss Require Different Solutions
Asia Investor Group on Climate Change: State of Investor Climate Transition in Asia 2026 – 7th Edition
Asia Investor Group on Climate Change: State of Investor Climate Transition in Asia 2026 – 7th Edition
(https://aigcc.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/AIGCC-Climate-Transition-Report_May2026.pdf)
AIGCC's 7th-edition stocktake of 240 Asian institutional investors finds the climate transition entering an "implementation phase" — but the gap between net-zero ambition and credible transition plans remains the central challenge.
Focal points
- Investor climate work in Asia is moving into a third phase. After Phase 1 (measurement/disclosure) and Phase 2 (scrutiny/accountability and the rise of "greenwashing"), AIGCC reports that 2025 marks a shift to implementation — intentional capital allocation and stewardship aimed at real-economy outcomes rather than passive divestment.
- The execution gap is wide. 80% of AIGCC members have committed to net zero and 58% have set interim targets, yet only 42% have published a credible transition plan. Net-zero commitments without pathways "risk remaining aspirational."
- Policy advocacy disclosure among members has tripled in two years (19% → 58%), and capital commitments to climate solutions / transition finance have leapt from 18% to 68% (+50pp over three years). Physical risk disclosure has also more than doubled (29% → 61%).
Contents
... covers five themes ...
- Theme 1 — From Net Zero Commitments to Credible Transition Plans (the implementation gap)
- Theme 2 — Climate Investments: Growing Momentum but Scaling Challenges (priority opportunities: energy storage, renewables, green infrastructure, low-carbon transport)
- Theme 3 — Stewardship Approaches are Taking a Systems Lens (engagement, voting, system stewardship)
- Theme 4 — The Transition Lens is Widening (physical risk, nature/biodiversity, deforestation, Just Transition)
- Theme 5 — Policy Advocacy Disclosure Triples in Two Years (advocacy modes and outcomes)
- Sponsor case study (Kasikorn Asset Management): data-driven portfolio climate transition management in an emerging-market context
Methodology: desktop review of 240 significant Asian investors (116 asset owners + 124 asset managers, median AUM US$110bn, 84% headquartered across 19 Asian markets), of which 66 are AIGCC members. Supplemented by survey responses from 59 investors. Sponsored by S&P Global.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Asia Investor Group on Climate Change: Incorporating Climate Factors into South Korea's 'Productive Finance' Framework
Asia Investor Group on Climate Change: Incorporating Climate Factors into South Korea's 'Productive Finance' Framework
AIGCC's consolidated briefing across four Korean climate-finance reforms (KSSB disclosure roadmap, Climate Finance Activation Strategy, Transition Finance Guideline, 4th National Adaptation Plan, and Stewardship Code revision) — read together, they form a layered system whose effectiveness will depend on coherent operation rather than the ambition of any single measure.
Focal points
- Korea's climate-policy architecture is becoming a system. Over less than a year, authorities have introduced five reforms covering disclosure (KSSB Roadmap), mitigation finance (KRW 790tn Climate Finance Activation Strategy + Transition Finance Guideline), adaptation finance (4th NAP), and stewardship (Korea Stewardship Code revision — the first since 2016).
- Public capital cannot meet Korea's transition need on its own. The KRW 790tn envelope is significant but transition investment requirements are "in the thousands of trillions of KRW"; framework design must therefore catalyse private capital — including international institutional capital — via concrete risk-sharing structures (first-loss tranches, contracts for difference, blended finance), credible transition plans (TPT / GFANZ / IFRS S2-aligned), and sectoral roadmaps for steel, petrochemicals, cement.
- Korea is one of only two major jurisdictions (alongside Italy) whose stewardship code still does not address climate or ESG factors. AIGCC's recommended Code revision references climate-related risk as integral to fiduciary duty, recognises collaborative engagement (Climate Action 100+ style) and "systems stewardship" as legitimate, and asks asset owners to integrate climate stewardship performance into manager selection.
Contents
... consolidates four submissions made to Korean authorities between March and May 2026 ...
- Section 1 — Disclosure: Korea's Draft KSSB Roadmap (seven areas where the proposed FY2027 / KRW 30tn threshold roadmap should be strengthened, including bringing Scope 3 forward from 2031 to a one-year deferral)
- Section 2 — Mitigation Finance: Climate Finance Activation Strategy & Transition Finance Guideline (catalytic public finance design, sectoral roadmaps, credibility assessment, international alignment with ICMA / ASEAN Transition Finance Guidance)
- Section 3 — Adaptation Finance: 4th National Climate Crisis Adaptation Plan (only 5 of 210 Korean green bonds are classified as Climate Adaptation; bankable resilience pipelines, K-Taxonomy operationalisation, Climate Risk Maps 2029)
- Section 4 — Investment Stewardship: Korea Stewardship Code Amendment (climate as fiduciary duty, collaborative engagement, systems stewardship, manager-selection integration)
- Cross-cutting priorities: interoperability and international alignment, private capital mobilisation alongside public finance, institutional investors as policy-implementation stakeholders
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Asia Investor Group on Climate Change: Turning Risk into Returns: An Engagement Framework for Asia's Methane Opportunity in Oil and Gas
Asia Investor Group on Climate Change: Turning Risk into Returns: An Engagement Framework for Asia's Methane Opportunity in Oil and Gas
(https://aigcc.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/AIGCC-Methane-Engagement-Guide_v4-compressed.pdf)
AIGCC's first dedicated methane engagement framework for Asian institutional investors. Authored by Cammie Koh, supported by the Environmental Defense Fund, the framework targets oil and gas operators — the largest near-term climate lever and a sector where most abatement is net-revenue-positive.
Focal points
- Methane is uniquely actionable. Most oil and gas methane abatement costs less than the value of recovered gas — interventions are net-revenue-positive for issuers. Investors can drive measurable impact without conflict between climate ambition and financial performance.
- Asia is the priority geography for the framework: upstream and midstream operators where measurement infrastructure (continuous monitoring, OGMP 2.0 reporting) and corporate target-setting are less developed than at OECD producers.
- The framework gives investors a structured engagement playbook: a tiered ladder of escalating asks (commit → measure → target → reduce → verify), benchmark indicators for each tier, dialogue points tailored to NOCs vs listed majors, and use of voting / collaborative engagement as escalation tools.
Contents
... covers ...
- The methane case for investors: warming attribution, regulatory direction (US, EU, IMO), and the cost curve of abatement
- Asian oil and gas sector overview: emissions baselines, disclosure gaps, and engagement priorities
- Tiered engagement framework: ask ladder, benchmark indicators, escalation triggers
- Dialogue points for engagement with NOCs vs listed majors
- Collaborative engagement and voting as escalation tools
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Pictet Asset Management: Responsible Investment Report 2026
Pictet Asset Management: Responsible Investment Report 2026
Pictet Asset Management's annual flagship Responsible Investment Report — covering engagement, voting, investment solutions, and thought leadership across its responsible-investment activity in 2025.
Focal points
- Annual stocktake of Pictet AM's RI activity: engagement themes, voting record, and integration across strategies.
- Pictet AM positions responsible investment as embedded in its investment framework rather than as a parallel ESG overlay — the report is the audit trail.
- The 2026 edition is the latest in an annual series and is the primary reference for clients and consultants assessing Pictet AM's RI credentials.
Contents
... covers ...
- Engagement programme: themes, dialogues, outcomes
- Voting record and stewardship priorities
- Investment solutions across thematic equities, multi-asset, alternatives, emerging markets
- Thought leadership and policy positioning
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
FAIRR Initiative: Coller FAIRR Seafood Index: Material Environmental and Social Risks Across the Global Seafood Sector
FAIRR Initiative: Coller FAIRR Seafood Index: Material Environmental and Social Risks Across the Global Seafood Sector
FAIRR's new Coller FAIRR Seafood Index benchmarks the world's largest publicly-listed seafood producers on the environmental and social risks material to long-term investors — expanding FAIRR's animal-protein materiality framework into the seafood supply chain.
Focal points
- First systematic seafood benchmark from FAIRR — builds on a decade of work on terrestrial animal protein via the Coller FAIRR Protein Producer Index.
- Coverage spans the biggest listed players across wild-catch and aquaculture, scoring them on material environmental risks (overfishing, biodiversity, climate, antibiotic use) and social risks (labour, traceability).
- Designed as an engagement and capital-allocation tool: investor members can use the Index to prioritise dialogues and identify outliers, both positive and negative.
Contents
... covers ...
- Benchmark methodology and scoring framework across material risk pillars
- Sector-level findings and outliers
- Engagement priorities for investors
- Implications for portfolio risk assessment in food and seafood supply chains
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
FAIRR Initiative: Deregulating Chilean Salmon Farming: Where's the Catch?
FAIRR Initiative: Deregulating Chilean Salmon Farming: Where's the Catch?
(https://www.fairr.org/news-events/insights/deregulating-chilean-salmon-farming-wheres-the-catch)
FAIRR Insight piece on a proposed Chilean deregulation package for salmon farming — raising biodiversity and oceans-risk questions for investors with exposure to Chilean aquaculture supply chains.
Contents
- The proposed regulatory changes in Chile and what they would alter for farmed-salmon production
- Material environmental and social risks: biodiversity, oceans, antibiotic use, labour
- Implications for investors in listed Chilean aquaculture producers and downstream consumer-facing customers
- Engagement angles for investors concerned about long-term licence-to-operate risk
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Pictet Asset Management: National security and environmental risks: dual threat to portfolios
Pictet Asset Management: National security and environmental risks: dual threat to portfolios
(https://am.pictet.com/us/en/mega/2026/sustainable-investing-planetary-boundaries)
Pictet AM's Mega thought-leadership piece argues that national-security risk and environmental risk — historically treated as separate portfolio considerations — are increasingly entangled, and need to be modelled as a dual threat to long-term investment returns.
Contents
- The case that planetary boundaries and geopolitical security risk now reinforce each other (resource scarcity, climate-driven migration, energy transition rivalry)
- Implications for sustainable-investment frameworks that treat the two risks separately
- Portfolio positioning: sectors and themes positioned to absorb or benefit from the dual-risk environment
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Pictet Asset Management: Feeding the world with bio-agriculture
Pictet Asset Management: Feeding the world with bio-agriculture
(https://am.pictet.com/us/en/mega/2026/bio-agriculture)
Pictet AM Mega piece on bio-agriculture — framing biological inputs (biofertilisers, biopesticides, microbiome interventions, precision biology) as both a food-security necessity and an investment opportunity in the broader sustainable-food transition.
Contents
- The food-system challenge: feeding a growing population while reducing chemical and emissions intensity of agriculture
- The bio-agriculture toolkit: biofertilisers, biopesticides, microbiome, precision biology
- Investment angle: companies and value chains positioned to benefit as bio-inputs scale
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Pictet Asset Management: Ahead 2026: Trends shaping the future of investments
Pictet Asset Management: Ahead 2026: Trends shaping the future of investments
Pictet AM's Ahead 2026 report, sitting under its Active Equity capability, gathers cross-team perspectives on the trends most likely to shape investment outcomes over the next horizon — with actionable inputs from Pictet's investment leaders and external thought leaders.
Contents
- Trends shaping the future of investments — cross-team and cross-discipline view
- Actionable insights aimed at portfolio managers and asset allocators
- Companion to Pictet's thematic equity, multi-asset, and alternatives frameworks
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Baillie Gifford: Uber's age of autonomy
Baillie Gifford: Uber's age of autonomy
Baillie Gifford Investment Manager Helen Xiong (Global Alpha team) sets out why the firm bought Uber in early 2025 when the market was selling it on Tesla's robo-taxi announcement — arguing the market missed that Uber already operates the frictionless future Musk envisaged by blending human and autonomous drivers in one network.
Focal points
- Why Baillie Gifford bought when others sold. Uber matches passengers with Alphabet's Waymo AVs via its app in Phoenix, Austin and Atlanta, and has partnerships with Pony.ai, Baidu, Wayve, WeRide, Lucid and Nuro — positioning it to aggregate global robo-taxi demand rather than be displaced by it.
- Network advantage as structural moat. Waymo AVs on Uber in Phoenix were busier than 99% of human equivalents. A would-be competitor network has to flood capacity to meet rush-hour demand and then absorb idle vehicles at night — returns-per-vehicle collapse. Uber's mixed-fleet model expands and contracts with demand.
- The super-app angle. Uber One subscription (36m+ members), travel booking, in-app advertising, food delivery and stakes in Grab and Aurora point to a Uber-as-daily-utility play. August 2025's $20bn buyback signalled balance-sheet confidence. The recent NVIDIA partnership opens a path to level-4 fully autonomous vehicles on the network.
Contents
... covers ...
- Why Baillie Gifford bought during the Tesla robo-taxi sell-off
- Growth in current markets: penetration gaps (0.5% in India/Spain vs 6.5% in Australia) and ride-hailing + Uber Eats network effects
- Top of the robo-taxi rank: utilisation rates, scale advantages, ground-ops capability
- A 'super-app' and more: Uber One, travel booking, advertising, partnerships
- Waymo as another Baillie Gifford-held stake in future mobility
- Risk factors and disclosure
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Guinness Global Investors: How has the Iran conflict accelerated the energy transition?
Guinness Global Investors: How has the Iran conflict accelerated the energy transition?
(https://www.guinnessgi.com/insights/how-has-iran-conflict-accelerated-energy-transition)
Guinness Global Investors' Sustainable Energy team on how the Iran conflict — having removed ~12 million barrels of oil per day from global markets — is accelerating the structural energy transition by reinforcing energy-security arguments for renewables, transmission and storage investment.
Note: Buzz drafted from Guinness homepage listing; underlying article not directly fetched during this scan. Body should be checked against the primary article before posting.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Mirova: Mirova Global Equity Strategy: Impact Report 2025
Mirova: Mirova Global Equity Strategy: Impact Report 2025
(https://www.mirova.com/en/ideas/mirova-global-equity-strategy-impact-report-2025-US)
Mirova's 2025 Impact Report for its Global Equity Strategy — the annual stocktake of the portfolio's contribution to sustainable-development outcomes, with measured impact KPIs across the strategy's thematic exposures.
Note: Buzz drafted from publication-index summary on mirova.com; underlying report not directly fetched during this scan. Body should be checked against the primary publication before posting.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
EdenTree Investment Management: Sustainable Investment Activity Report – Q1 2026
EdenTree Investment Management: Sustainable Investment Activity Report – Q1 2026
(https://www.edentreeim.com/insights/sustainable-investment-activity-report-q1-2026)
EdenTree's quarterly Sustainable Investment Activity Report for Q1 2026 — the regular cadence of engagement, voting, and sustainability-research activity across EdenTree's SDR-labelled fund range.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Boston Trust Walden: 2025 Annual Active Ownership Report
Boston Trust Walden: 2025 Annual Active Ownership Report
(https://www.bostontrustwalden.com/2025-annual-active-ownership-report/)
Boston Trust Walden's 2025 Annual Active Ownership Report — the annual stocktake of the firm's stewardship and engagement activity (five decades of experience in active ownership for environmental and social outcomes), covering engagement themes, proxy-voting record, and case studies.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
AIGCC: Asia 2030 Climate Playbook: How Asian asset owners can deliver 2030 targets and scale climate investment
AIGCC: Asia 2030 Climate Playbook: How Asian asset owners can deliver 2030 targets and scale climate investment
(https://aigcc.net/asset-owners-in-asia-make-crucial-progress-on-climate-defying-global-narrative/)
Under AIGCC's Asset Owners Program, this Playbook reframes Asia's 2030 climate path as an investment problem rather than a compliance one — introducing the 5/50/10 framing: 5%+ returns, ~50% emission reduction, 5–10% portfolio allocation to climate investments.
Focal points
- The 5/50/10 framing as a practical 2030 anchor for asset owners: 5%+ returns, ~50% emission reduction, 5–10% allocation to climate investments. Designed to demonstrate that long-term performance, material emissions reduction, and increased climate-solutions allocation can be achieved in parallel.
- Seven investment approaches and four asset-owner archetypes mapped to the diverse landscape of Asian asset owner types (sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, insurers, endowments) and their current starting positions.
- Strategy design choices that matter most in practice: governance, implementation pathways, and organisational resourcing — alongside beta opportunities (risk management and resilience) and alpha opportunities (climate-aligned growth and innovation).
Contents
... covers ...
- Mapping the landscape of Asian asset owner types and current progress against climate metrics
- The 5/50/10 framing and its evidence base
- Seven investment approaches for climate integration across portfolios
- Four asset-owner archetypes and how to fit strategy to type
- Strategy design choices: governance, implementation, organisational resourcing
- Beta vs alpha opportunities — risk-management and growth angles for climate allocation
Note: this summary is drawn from AIGCC's press release and from references to the Playbook in the parallel State of Investor Climate Transition in Asia 2026 report; the underlying full Playbook was not directly accessible to the drafting agent and the body should be re-checked against the primary document before posting.
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
AIGCC: 2025 Year in Review: Building Climate Resilience Through Investor Action
AIGCC: 2025 Year in Review: Building Climate Resilience Through Investor Action
(https://aigcc.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/AIGCC-2025-Year-In-Review_final-compressed.pdf)
AIGCC's 2025 annual review — institutional investors in Asia continued to integrate climate factors despite global headwinds. Asset owners now 23% of members, combined AUM crossed US$36 trillion, and AIGCC consolidated its position as the region's primary investor voice on climate policy.
Focal points
- Asset owners are now 23% of AIGCC's membership (including observers) — a deliberate strategic shift toward bringing more long-term capital into the climate transition conversation in Asia.
- Year-on-year progress across most key climate metrics: net-zero commitments, interim target-setting, transition planning, physical-risk disclosure, and policy advocacy disclosure all rose materially among AIGCC members (detail in the parallel State of Investor Climate Transition in Asia 2026 report).
- Stewardship and engagement programmes — the Asian Utilities Engagement Program (AUEP) and Climate Action 100+ — drove more ambitious and transparent climate commitments from companies in high-emitting sectors including energy, transport, and steel.
Contents
... structured around three positioning claims and a state-of-play assessment ...
- "Trusted relationships with Asia's policy-makers" — policy advocacy outcomes and government engagement case studies
- "Asia's best thought leadership and investment resources" — 2025 publications, working group outputs, and capacity-building programmes
- "Enabling climate progress in Asia's key industries" — AUEP and CA100+ engagement progress with energy companies and heavy emitters
- Investors' Progress, Ability & Ambition — quantified state-of-play across the membership and Climate Performance Indicators
- Letter from the CEO (Rebecca Mikula-Wright) framing 2025 as a year of "resilience and perseverance" amid geopolitical headwinds
[Selected by Mike (54) | Summarised by Opus 4.7 | Human-directed; AI-powered]
Sarasin & Partners: How an oil crisis accelerates energy transition
Sarasin & Partners: How an oil crisis accelerates energy transition
"Energy price shocks may boost fossil fuels in the short term, but they tend to accelerate the shift towards cleaner energy and the infrastructure that supports it...."
… contains …
- The return data is unambiguous
- Why energy crises undermine fossil fuel demand
- The geopolitical multiplier
- The cost advantage that does not reverse
- A transition accelerated, not delayed
Ian Robertson: Sustainability by Proxy: Support for Shareholder ESG Proposals by Investor Type
Ian Robertson: Sustainability by Proxy: Support for Shareholder ESG Proposals by Investor Type
(https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6537042)
Abstract
Ownership of public companies spans geography - institutional investors and investee companies are often located in different cities, states, and countries-with governance conducted by proxy, including for votes on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues raised by shareholders.
A frequent assumption by researchers and advocacy groups is that all ESG proposals should be supported, but this stakeholder orientation can be at odds with the framework used by investors.
Despite its many theoretical and empirical shortcomings, modern portfolio theory (MPT) remains the foundational framework as it both informs the structure of the investment industry (asset owners, active managers, passive managers) and the benchmarks against which investors' risk-adjusted performance is measured.
The research presented here is amongst the first to extend the MPT framework to proxy voting on ESG issues.
- The Bayesian modelling shows that asset owners support shareholder ESG proposals ~70% of the time.
- Support by active managers is size-dependent but even for large managers doesn't exceed ~45%.
- The largest passive managers exhibit much lower levels of support.
The results are broadly consistent with the characteristics and incentives implied by MPT and support development of a Modern Proxy Theory that offers a theoretical and empirical framework for further investigation, including the financial materiality of ESG issues and the geography of proxy voting.
Robertson, Ian, Sustainability by Proxy: Support for Shareholder ESG Proposals by Investor Type (April 20, 2026). Available at SSRN
TPI Centre: Latest Carbon Performance data for cement now available
TPI Centre: Latest Carbon Performance data for cement now available
(https://www.transitionpathwayinitiative.org/corporates/cement)
- Explore the results of relevant companies now on the TPI tool.
- Read the TPI Centre’s Cement methodology note.
CBI/ECIU: Net Gains: The UK's Net Zero Economy in 2025
CBI/ECIU: Net Gains: The UK's Net Zero Economy in 2025
(https://www.cbi.org.uk/articles/net-gains-the-uks-net-zero-economy-in-2025/)
New analysis from CBI Economics and ECIU reveals a £105 billion sector generating high-wage jobs across every UK nation and region.
ESG Dive: ESG, sustainability leadership appointments driving change in 2026
ESG Dive: ESG, sustainability leadership appointments driving change in 2026
Companies are hiring industry veterans and creating new positions to help meet decarbonization goals and navigate an increasingly complex regulatory landscape.
Trellis: The State of the Sustainability Profession in 2026
Trellis: The State of the Sustainability Profession in 2026
(https://trellis.net/report/state-of-the-sustainability-profession-2026/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
Though the pace of investment has slowed and priorities have shifted, most large businesses continue to advance sustainability in stormy times, according to our ninth biennial survey of sustainability professionals.
Boston Trust Walden: Active Ownership Report 2025
Boston Trust Walden: Active Ownership Report 2025
Published: 2026 reporting cycle
Summary: Report focuses heavily on climate, human rights, labour standards and shareholder resolutions, with a semphasis on real-world outcomes and policy change.
T Rowe Price: Investment Stewardship Report 2025
T Rowe Price: Investment Stewardship Report 2025
(https://www.troweprice.com/content/dam/trowecorp/Pdfs/esg/stewardship-report.pdf)
Published: March 2026
Summary: including climate, governance, human capital and executive remuneration engagement themes.
Jobs 50 of 641 results
JobPost: JPMorganChase - Environmental & Social Due Diligence Lead (NYC)
JobPost: JPMorganChase - Environmental & Social Due Diligence Lead (NYC)
Job Identification 210756184
Job Category Firmwide Risk and Compliance
Business Unit Commercial & Investment Bank
Posting Date 09/06/2026, 19:16
Locations 277 Park Ave, New York, NY, 10172, US
Job Schedule Full time
JobPost: T Rowe Price - Analyst, Data Analytics - Global Sustainability (London)
JobPost: T Rowe Price - Analyst, Data Analytics - Global Sustainability (London)
The ESG Data Analyst will support a range of ESG quantitative analysis to support the Global Sustainability team as well as members of the equity, fixed income and multi-asset team focused on providing customized sustainable solutions.
JobPost: MUFG - Analyst/Associate, Sustainable Client Solutions (London)
JobPost: MUFG - Analyst/Associate, Sustainable Client Solutions (London)
An exceptional opportunity has arisen to join the newly established Sustainable Client Solutions (SCS) Team in London. The SCS Team is responsible for working closely with Relationship Managers and Product Partners throughout in the Global Corporate Investment Bank, Japanese Corporate Banking Division, and Global Markets in the Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) region in order to promote engagement on sustainable finance and sustainable advisory (i.e. ESG ratings, disclosures, and controversies), as well as spearheading EMEA’s Green Transformation (GX) strategy, all of which are core pillars of the region’s client solution proposition.
JobPost: Standard Chartered - Manager, Sustainability Reporting (London)
JobPost: Standard Chartered - Manager, Sustainability Reporting (London)
Job Location: London, GBR
Global Grade: Band 6
Work Type: Office Working
Employment Type: Permanent
Posting Start Date: 03/06/2026
Posting End Date: -
JobPost: NatWest - Sustainability Disclosures Business Analyst (London)
JobPost: NatWest - Sustainability Disclosures Business Analyst (London)
Closing date for applications: 15/06/2026
Location London, United Kingdom
Job type Permanent | Contract typeFull Time
Remote / On-site Hybrid
You’ll spend some of your time at home, working with your team digitally. You’ll also regularly work at your office or hub to collaborate with your colleagues.
Managerial / Technical Lead
JobPost: PRI - Senior Internal Communications & Engagement Business Partner (London)
JobPost: PRI - Senior Internal Communications & Engagement Business Partner (London)
(https://app.beapplied.com/apply/8fecqqyqsh)
(12 Month FTC- Family Leave Cover)
Principles for Responsible Investment
Employment Type Contract Please note, where PRI has an office there is an expectation to work a minimum of 2 days per week
Location Hybrid · London, City of, UK
Team CEO Office
Seniority Mid-level
Closing: 11:59pm, 21st Jun 2026 BST
JobPost: Man Group: Data Scientist – Responsible Investment (London)
JobPost: Man Group: Data Scientist – Responsible Investment (London)
(https://job-boards.eu.greenhouse.io/mangroup/jobs/4863672101?gh_src=ksyc7542teu)
As a Data Scientist, you will be embedded within Man Group's Responsible Investment (RI) function — working day-to-day alongside the RI research, stewardship and investment teams to deliver data-driven insights.
Man Group is a leader in bespoke proprietary RI investment and has created several tools and datasets. In this role you will acquire, wrangle, map and analyse large structured and unstructured RI and sustainability datasets, acting as a subject matter expert at the intersection of data science and responsible investment.
Work spans the full data lifecycle and is delivered through self-managed projects in close collaboration with the RI team and the wider Data & AI division.
JobPost: CFC - Sustainability & Governance Senior Associate (London)
JobPost: CFC - Sustainability & Governance Senior Associate (London)
Working across a fast-moving, high-growth insurance business, you’ll partner closely with teams across Underwriting, Governance, Operations and Finance to ensure sustainability is practical, measurable, and embedded in decision-making. You’ll also support the ongoing development of our policy governance framework, helping ensure the right level of control, consistency, and oversight as we scale.
JobPost: PRI - Workplace & Facilities Manager (London)
JobPost: PRI - Workplace & Facilities Manager (London)
Employment Type Full timeThere is an expectation to be in the office 4 days and one WFH
Location Hybrid · London, UK
Seniority Mid-level
Closing: 11:59pm, 14th Jun 2026 BST
JobPost: UBS - Stewardship Analyst – Corporate Governance & Active Ownership (London)
JobPost: UBS - Stewardship Analyst – Corporate Governance & Active Ownership (London)
Are you passionate about Sustainable Investing and in particular Investor Stewardship? Investor stewardship is a core component of UBS Asset Management’s fiduciary and sustainable investing approach. We are seeking an experienced Stewardship Analyst to strengthen our corporate governance, proxy voting and engagement capabilities across global investments
JobPost: Franklin Templeton - Sustainability Data Analyst (Edinburgh)
JobPost: Franklin Templeton - Sustainability Data Analyst (Edinburgh)
The Investment Sustainability Solutions Team (ISST) is a multidisciplinary group of sustainable investment professionals specialising in sustainability data and research, stewardship and engagement, and sustainability policy and reporting. The team supports investment teams and their clients by helping them consider and integrate sustainability within the investment process, partnering closely with Investment Risk, Compliance, Technology, and Product to enable rigorous, data-driven investment decision-making. ISST operates as a highly collaborative, cross-functional group within Franklin Templeton’s global platform, offering an environment that values intellectual curiosity, partnership with portfolio managers, and continued development across evolving sustainability priorities.
[Posted 30+ days ago, ad still live]
JobPost: BNP Paribas - Senior Sustainability Consultant (London)
JobPost: BNP Paribas - Senior Sustainability Consultant (London)
(https://group.bnpparibas/en/careers/job-offer/senior-sustainability-consultant?src=JB-12380)
We are seeking an experienced Senior Sustainability Consultant to play a key role in growing our ESG consultancy offering. Working closely with our UK and international sustainability specialists you will support business development, strengthen our market presence, and promote our innovative sustainability services. The role is a blend of technical ESG expertise, client relationship and project management, providing crucial support to investors, asset managers, and corporate occupiers as they navigate regulatory demands, investor expectations, and operational performance goals
JobPost: USS - Senior Responsible Investment Associate (London)
JobPost: USS - Senior Responsible Investment Associate (London)
(https://usslondon.appellia.com/web/vacancy/42fdb5b4-5cb2-4d17-a163-899ed8ae08a0)
In your role as Senior Responsible Investment Associate, you will make a meaningful and valued contribution from the outset. This role will provide a great opportunity to support the delivery of PMG’s Responsible Investment strategy, ensuring consistent, efficient and high-quality execution across PMG asset classes and mandates. The successful candidate will bridge the gap between technical RI expertise and practical, value creation applications within private markets.
JobPost: Vanguard - Senior Sustainability Disclosure Oversight Analyst (London/Dublin)
JobPost: Vanguard - Senior Sustainability Disclosure Oversight Analyst (London/Dublin)
(https://www.vanguardjobs.com/job/22909595/?source=LinkedIn)
This is an exciting opportunity to shape and embed a new Sustainability Disclosure Oversight capability within Operations, tasked with providing a holistic review over global sustainability entity-level disclosures.
This role will ensure the accuracy, consistency, and alignment of Vanguard's sustainability disclosures; reviewing, benchmarking, and enhancing ESG content across frameworks and geographies. You'll challenge ESG data validation, conduct external comparisons, and drive continuous improvement to ensure our disclosures are clear, credible, and consistent.
[posted March 2 appears still to be live ad]
JobPost: AngloAmerican - Specialist - Sustainability Reporting (FTC) various locations offered
JobPost: AngloAmerican - Specialist - Sustainability Reporting (FTC) various locations offered
This is a Fixed Term Contract opportunity
Can be based in UK, South Africa, Chile, Peru, Brazil
JobPost: BlackRock - Associate - Sustainability & Transition Solutions - Platform team, London
JobPost: BlackRock - Associate - Sustainability & Transition Solutions - Platform team, London
(https://careers.blackrock.com/job/-/-/45831/95090246544?source=LinkedIn)
The S&T Platform Strategy & Governance team is seeking an Associate in EMEA to support sustainability strategy, S&T product ideation, market intelligence, and governance activities across the S&T platform. The role sits at the intersection of sustainable product strategy, competitor and industry monitoring, platform analytics, and regulatory‑driven initiatives, with exposure to multiple stakeholders and cross‑functional strategic projects within GPS and BlackRock more broadly.
JobPost; GS - Asset & Wealth Management, Sustainability and Impact Client Solutions, Associate - New York
JobPost; GS - Asset & Wealth Management, Sustainability and Impact Client Solutions, Associate - New York
The Sustainability & Impact Client Solutions team mobilizes the full range of sustainability insights, advisory services and investment solutions across our client segments and asset classes (Publics Markets Investing and GS Alternatives, External Investing Group). We collaborate with sustainability teams across the division and firm to deliver the breadth and depth of our sustainability capabilities to our clients. We are seeking an associate to join the team in NYC to fill a unique role focused on developing differentiated insights on leading edge topics on sustainable investing and better serving our clients with content-rich advisory services. This role will work closely with our global team, in addition to working with our Institutional sales teams to deliver client solutions that focus on Sustainability and Impact Investing across public and private markets. In addition, this role will work with various investment teams to support investment product development and broader delivery of our capabilities across different asset classes and across different regions.
JobPost: Broadridge - Sustainability Analyst NYC and NJ (Hybrid)
JobPost: Broadridge - Sustainability Analyst NYC and NJ (Hybrid)
As a Sustainability Analyst, you will play an active role in advancing Broadridge’s sustainability initiatives, contributing to the company’s progress toward its near-term and net-zero emissions reduction goals. In this role, you will manage data collection, analysis, and reporting tasks, support supplier engagement activities, and contribute to projects that advance our environmental commitments. This position provides hands-on experience in corporate sustainability, greenhouse gas (GHG) measurement, and sustainable supply chain management, while offering opportunities to learn from and collaborate with experienced sustainability professionals.
JobPost: DHL Group - Account & Sustainability Manager (Birmingham UK)
JobPost: DHL Group - Account & Sustainability Manager (Birmingham UK)
Please be aware that interviews are provisionally scheduled to take place during the week commencing 18th May 2026. Applications received after this date may not be considered but will be added to our talent pool for future opportunities, subject to your consent.
JobPost: LGPS Central - Responsible Investment & Stewardship Analyst (Wolverhampton, UK)
JobPost: LGPS Central - Responsible Investment & Stewardship Analyst (Wolverhampton, UK)
(https://recruitment.cezannehr.com/shared/job/responsible-investment-stewardship-ana-88fed/Linkedin)
LGPS Central (LGPSC) Ltd is the FCA regulated asset manager for eight local authority pension funds across the Midlands.
JobPost: PRI - Associate, Product Owner (Family Leave Cover) - 9 Month FTC
JobPost: PRI - Associate, Product Owner (Family Leave Cover) - 9 Month FTC
(https://app.beapplied.com/apply/dxcrosogrc)
Location Hybrid · London, UK
Team - Ri Solutions
Seniority - Junior
Closing: 11:59pm, 3rd May 2026 BST
JobPost: MSCI - Senior Associate - Index R&D - Structured Products (London)
JobPost: MSCI - Senior Associate - Index R&D - Structured Products (London)
This responsibility spans all factor, thematic, cap-weighted and sustainability & climate Indexes
JobPost: PRI - Director, Communications (London/US, close 26 April)
JobPost: PRI - Director, Communications (London/US, close 26 April)
(https://app.beapplied.com/apply/656cksg8vc)
The Director of Communications provides senior strategic communications leadership for PRI, using communications as a deliberate lever to reinforce PRI’s value, credibility and coherence with signatories and external stakeholders. The role shapes the external narrative, protects and enhances reputation, and translates complex technical and policy work into clear, decision‑useful messages that strengthen the enabling environment for responsible investment.
JobPost: IFM Investors - Associate, Sustainable Investment (London)
JobPost: IFM Investors - Associate, Sustainable Investment (London)
12month Fixed Term Contract
IFM Investors is a global asset manager, founded and owned by pension funds, with capabilities in infrastructure equity and debt, private equity, private credit, real estate and listed equities.
JobPost: Tesco - ESG New Regulations Manager (Welwyn Garden City, UK, close 14 Apr)
JobPost: Tesco - ESG New Regulations Manager (Welwyn Garden City, UK, close 14 Apr)
(https://careers.tesco.com/en_GB/careers/JobDetail/176277)
About the role
This is an exciting opportunity to work in ESG Reporting. There is an increasing drive to promote transparency and comparability of ESG reporting across organisations to support sustainable investment decisions and progressive agendas in this space. This includes the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which is a new reporting requirement covering the full breadth of ESG with a large number of disclosure requirements alongside the EU Taxonomy which assesses the sustainability credentials of a company’s financials.
JobPost: Royal London - ESG Credit Analyst (London, close 13 Apr)
JobPost: Royal London - ESG Credit Analyst (London, close 13 Apr)
Job Title: ESG Credit Analyst
Contract Type: Permanent
Location: London
Working style: Hybrid 50% home/office based
Closing date: 13th April 2026
We have an opportunity for an ESG Credit Analyst to join the Royal London Asset Management (RLAM) Credit team on a permanent basis.
The role focuses on sustainable credit research and ESG integration across a range of sectors and offers opportunities for interaction with stakeholders across the wider business, as well as external clients and consultants.
You’ll join a collaborative and inclusive team, with significant opportunity for development and career progression.














